Hume & Schumacher Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 2500 words

Hume & Schumacher - Essay ExampleIn this research, school of thought has come to play a very critical role in the understanding of human life. It finds its pertinence from simple life questions such as the definition of terms to more complex debates about the crowning(prenominal) purpose of life as well as what is real and what is vague. One of the greatest philosophers ever seen in history was David Hume (1711-1776). His essays and publications are now used by scholars both in Philosophy and other faculty member disciplines. The purpose of this paper is to examine his views and arguments from the viewpoint of another great philosopher, Schumacher, E.F (1911-1977). David Hume is regarded as one of the greatest philosophers to go through ever lived. His essays, Moral, Political and Literary are recognized as a great contribution to the eighteenth Century Philosophy and the succeeding years. Similarly, several outstanding philosophers such as Immanuel Kant and Jeremy Bentham posse ss confessed being promptly influenced by his works. Similarly, Charles Darwin attested to Hume as a central influence (Hume 34). Hume is honored for having written in believably every branch of Philosopher but more so in the area of human science. Some critics have referred to him as our politics, religion and also our economy. ... Regarding cause and effect, or causality, he believes that, as all domain do, that there is no flatt without a cause, and that this conception is inborn, not taught, or induced in to us. Referring to his predecessors, Hume questions what the kin between cause and effect really means (Guyer 26). By giving real life examples, he concludes that our perception of connecting two events is not based on a close scrutiny but by the closeness of the two events. He states that it is impossible to bang the connection between the two events. We only experience the events themselves but not the actual causing. Therefore, this causal theory is a mere construct i n our minds without both absolute foundation on experience. If his view is correct, many scientists, who consider themselves as searching for causes, would need to delimitate themselves. Secondly, Hume debates the existence of the self. The ancient example of a embark tied to a harbor where families brought their children to play on the decks rouses a question. After many years of aging, several parts of the enter, and finally, every single chip of the ship are replaced, such that there is nothing left of the original ship. A question rises on the originality of that ship, on whether the sign on the ship should read, This is the famous ship which fought many battles, or this is a replica of that ship. One would conclude that it is the same ship since its identity has remained unchanged over the years. Similarly, Biology teaches that every shred of the body is replaced after 7 years (Schumacher 19). Yet after those years, we still maintain our identity and even given the differe nt experiences we go through, we